Click on the links below for a report on our research aimed at helping farmers and communities become more resilient to disturbances such as climate change. At Meadowcreek, our Delta outpost and the many overseas projects we work with, we use our land and facilities as a launching pad for innovative and sustainable agricultural projects. We help young farmers, businesses, and communities learn how to survive and thrive.
The findings presented here are the results of a project funded by Southern SARE and also available on the SSARE website. Please give us some feedback on how our research works for you. You can access it by clicking on the chapter headings below and downloading pdfs.
Understanding resilience of agricultural systems rests on a few basic concepts. Our first chapter explores the adaptive cycle of all living systems, the concept of complex adaptive systems–all living systems independently reacting and adapting to each other making Nature chaotic–and the difference between engineering and ecological resilience. Then we introduce the eight qualities of resilient systems.
The foundation of all resilient systems is local self-organization, but what is local? What scale are you operating within and how does a self-organized system emerge? The following chapter will give you practical tools and real life examples to guide you in developing a robust locally self-organized food system.
It all begins with connectivity, your willingness to reach out and discover new partnerships and cooperative enterprises. But we can be too connected. How are we to be both connected and independent? We’ll explore this paradox in the following chapter.
How do resilient systems work with nature? How do systems become more integrated with natural ecological processes. How can natural processes become ecological engineers working on our behalf instead of enemies to be fought? The next chapter helps you make your systems more ecologically integrated.
As we work with nature we encounter another resilience paradox. Ecologically resilient systems are highly diverse, but too much diversity can destroy a system. The following chapter shows that only through complementary diversity does resilience results.
Foremost among the qualities crucial to resilience are those which back up and reproduce the system. Whether it’s a backup business plan, seed stock, son, daughter or employee, who’s got your back?
The heart of any resilient agricultural system is high quality soil composed of a diverse set of complementary species. Soil represents part of the infrastructure any resilient system creates to support itself through any disturbance. Explore in the next chapter the quality of increasing physical infrastructure common to all resilient systems. We begin with the most basic infrastructure-you, the manager.
As we change our systems to become more self-organizing how do we conserve time tested strategies while also incorporating change and innovation? In the following chapter we explore the paradox of being innovative, yet traditional.
Sometimes innovation isn’t enough, the system must be totally transformed to respond to extreme disturbance. A system can become over-mature, calcified and slow to change in the face of disturbance. Resilient systems embrace disturbance, using it to ensure periodic transformation.
Above you learned of the eight qualities of resilient systems. A natural phenomenon can never be fully expressed in mere words. Others trying to explain and predict resilience have formulated the eight qualities in different ways. Deepen your understanding by exploring alternate ways of looking at resilience.
Perhaps you’re wondering how these qualities are present in permaculture, agroecology and other disciplines devoted to creating more sustainable agricultural systems? The following chapter will highlight many commonalities as well as a few important distinctions.
What do practitioners think about resilience and the route to more resilient and sustainable agricultural systems? The next chapter presents the results of our survey of Extension agents, farmers and other food system managers.
Resilient systems in Nature don’t worry much about social equity, poverty or quality of life. Yet we value all these in our human systems. It turns out the ecologically resilient systems have a dividend: health, poverty and inequality all are associated with ecologically resilient systems.
Finally, a review of the eight factors with a focus on building community resilience.
Look in the following appendix to see the methods we used for our qualitative and quantitative studies.
Here a copy of the paper version of the online survey
Below is the full collection of case studies generated from our study and cited in the chapters above. These case studies will help you broaden your understanding of resilience from real life examples. All of these stories cover at least five years of resilience, others more than 40. Take time to read and enjoy them.